Tourists' Perceptions of Udjo Ecoland Through the 4A Destination Framework

Main Article Content

Selvi Ramadanti
Dinarsiah Chendraningrum

Abstract

Udjo Ecoland is a tourism destination that combines cultural, educational, and nature-based experiences under the same management as Saung Angklung Udjo. This study aims to analyze tourists' perceptions of Udjo Ecoland Based on the four tourism destination components (4A): Attraction, Accessibility, Amenities, and Ancillary. A descriptive quantitative approach was employed, using a non-probability, purposive sampling technique to select 100 tourists who had visited Udjo Ecoland. Semi-structured interviews with one Site Manager and two tourists were used as supplementary contextual evidence. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, specifically mean and standard deviation, for each 4A dimension. The findings show that all four destination components were positively evaluated, ranging from Agree to Strongly Agree. Attraction recorded the highest mean score (4.26, Strongly Agree), followed by Ancillary (4.18, Strongly Agree), Amenities (3.94, Agree), and Accessibility (3.59, Agree). The findings indicate that Attraction is the strongest-rated component, while Accessibility is the main area for improvement. The interviews provide contextual explanations of destination strengths and operational challenges without establishing causal relationships with visitor fluctuations.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ramadanti, S., & Chendraningrum, D. (2026). Tourists’ Perceptions of Udjo Ecoland Through the 4A Destination Framework. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Travel Management, 4(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.58229/jthtm.v4i2.519
Section
Articles

References

Alvianna, S., Patalo, R. G., Hidayatullah, S., & Rachmawati, I. K. (2020). Pengaruh attraction, accessibility, amenity, ancillary terhadap kepuasan generasi millenial berkunjung ke tempat wisata. Jurnal Kepariwisataan: Destinasi, Hospitalitas dan Perjalanan, 4(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.34013/jk.v4i1.41

Angeline, A., & Anom, I. P. (2023). Persepsi wisatawan terhadap komponen produk pariwisata 4A pada daya tarik wisata Trans Studio Bali, Desa Pemecutan Kelod, Kecamatan Denpasar Barat, Kota Denpasar, Bali. Jurnal Destinasi Pariwisata, 11(2), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.24843/JDEPAR.2023.v11.i02.p15

Aulia, F. W., & Listyorini, H. (2025). Experiential learning and educational values of entrepreneurship in environmentally conscious educational tourism. Journal of Tourism Economics and Policy, 5(2), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.38142/jtep.v5i2.1305

Budi, A. A., & Aldianto, L. (2023). Pengembangan pariwisata budaya di Kota Bandung dalam sudut pandang implementasi kerja sama pemerintah dengan badan usaha. Inovasi Pembangunan: Jurnal Kelitbangan, 11(2), 109–122.

Candra, Y., & Yasri, Y. (2025). Destination authenticity: Investigating the mediating role of tourist satisfaction and loyalty. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(1), 2447–2455. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i1.5002

Cooper, C., Fletcher, J., Gilbert, D., & Wanhill, S. (2008). Tourism: Principles and Practice (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

Damayanti, R. A., & Puspitasari, A. Y. (2024). Kajian potensi daya tarik wisata heritage di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Ruang, 4, 13–34. http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/kr

Gani, H., Nanda, R., & Mazas, I. A. (2023). Penguatan kelembagaan Pokdarwis Tuah Peuraja untuk pengelolaan Desa Wisata Lamjamee, Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Pariwisata, 5(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.30647/jpp.v5i2.1749

Maryam, S. R., Susilawati, W., & Saepuloh, A. (2021). Pengaruh electronic word of mouth terhadap citra destinasi serta dampaknya terhadap keputusan berkunjung. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.52434/jkm.v15i2.3130

Masrurah, Z., Nisa, J., & Ardiansyah, A. N. (2024). Persepsi wisatawan terhadap daya tarik wisata di Taman Edukasi Ganespa Kota Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Pendidikan Geosfer, 9(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpg.v9i2.43618

Putra, D. A., & Wulansari, N. (2024). Persepsi wisatawan tentang Sapta Pesona Danau Maninjau Kabupaten Agam. Jurnal Manajemen Perhotelan dan Pariwisata, 6(3), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.23887/jmpp.v6i3.66812

Putri, G. S., Nurhasan, R., & Adiatma, D. (2024). Citra destinasi dan aksesibilitas pada kepuasan wisatawan di Karacak Valley Garut. Jurnal Paradigma: Journal of Sociology Research and Education, 5(2), 851–861. https://doi.org/10.53682/jpjsre.v5i2.9977

Santoso, A. (2023). Rumus Slovin: Panacea masalah ukuran sampel? Suksma: Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Sanata Dharma, 4(2), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.24071/suksma.v4i2.6434

Siburian, A. Y., & Nasution, H. P. (2023). Pengaruh aksesibilitas dan fasilitas The Kaldera Toba Nomadic Escape terhadap kepuasan wisatawan domestik. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 23639–23654. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i3.10367

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. ALFABETA.

Sukma, S. S., Saputri, D. O., & Prihatiningrum, A. (2023). Perancangan taman wisata edukasi dengan pendekatan arsitektur ekologi di Kota Bengkulu. Teknosia, 17(2), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.33369/teknosia.v17i2.28855

Walansendow, A. P. N. M., & Lagarense, B. E. S. (2016). Karakteristik model dan disain produk souvenir berbahan dasar kayu dan tempurung kelapa sebagai produk pariwisata. Tourism Scientific Journal, 1(2), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.32659/tsj.v1i2.7

Wibisono, N., & Subadra, I. N. (2018). Analisa persepsi wisatawan terhadap Jawa Barat sebagai destinasi wisata. Jurnal Perhotelan dan Pariwisata, 8(1), 16–34.

Wilson, J. (2021). Development strategy for the implementation of entertainment and recreational activities at tourism objects in Toba Regency. Tourism, Hospitality and Culture Insights Journal, 1(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.36983/thcij.v1i2.287

Yussabila, G. Z., & Sutarmin. (2025). Pengaruh fasilitas dan pengalaman wisatawan terhadap minat berkunjung kembali melalui kepuasan wisatawan: Studi pada Kabupaten Brebes. Peradaban Journal of Economic and Business, 4(2), 259–263. https://doi.org/10.59001/pjeb.v4i2.522