mata788 PERMATA123 PERJAKA188 slot88resmi slot88resmi hati108 login Situs toto warga123 RAJAINDO permata123 Akunbos PERMATA123 jokijp slot88resmi slot88jp https://kl108gambar.com https://kl108gambar.com BMW777 Slot gacor seni108 hoki88 seni108

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Article In Press
Articles

Hybrid Technology Internalisation Strategies in Industrial Services: The Case of Foam Pigging

PDF
  • Levina Marchyani,
  • Raden Aswin Rahadi
Levina Marchyani
School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung
Raden Aswin Rahadi
School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58229/jims.v4i1.436

Published 2026-01-01

Keywords

  • Foam Pigging,
  • Technology Internalisation,
  • Hybrid Strategy,
  • Joint Venture,
  • Talent Acquisition

How to Cite

Levina Marchyani, & Raden Aswin Rahadi. (2026). Hybrid Technology Internalisation Strategies in Industrial Services: The Case of Foam Pigging. Journal Integration of Management Studies, 4(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.58229/jims.v4i1.436

Abstract

Technology acquisition in specialised industrial services often fails to translate into internal capability when knowledge remains externalised. In Indonesia, foam pigging technology remains sourced from external actors, despite growing local content requirements and strategic interest in industrial independence. This study examines the case of PT BES by applying the Resource-Based View (RBV) and Knowledge-Based View (KBV) to assess internalisation pathways. Using a mixed-method approach, the study combines SWOT analysis and discounted cash flow modelling—covering Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Cash-on-Cash (CoC) returns—to evaluate two options: talent acquisition (TA) and joint venture (JV). Results show that while both approaches are financially viable, TA enables early control and learning, whereas JV offers long-term expansion with shared risk. The proposed hybrid sequence—TA followed by JV—supports gradual internal capability formation. This case contributes to technology management literature by demonstrating how hybrid strategies can resolve the tension between knowledge dependence and capability development under regulatory constraints.

PDF

References

  1. Journal Article
  2. Box, G. E. P., & Meyer, R. D. (1986). An analysis for unreplicated fractional factorials. Technometrics, 28(1), 11–18.
  3. Chanmon, A., & Sammut-Bonnici, T. (2015). Strategic technology transfer models in emerging industries. Journal of Business Strategy, 36(3), 45–52.
  4. Dyduch, W., Bratnicka-Myśliwiec, K., & Matusik, A. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage in technology-intensive firms. Journal of Business Research, 124, 180–192.
  5. Hui, K. (2015). Capital budgeting and net present value: A practical review for investment evaluation. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 20(3), 215–225.
  6. Jarunde, P. (2022). DCF-based investment appraisal under uncertainty: Implications for long-term project valuation. Journal of Financial Modeling, 14(2), 63–78.
  7. Kotlar, J., Fang, H., De Massis, A., & Frattini, F. (2013). Technology acquisition strategies and performance in innovation-driven industries. Technovation, 33(12), 351–367.
  8. Martinez, P., & Zuniga, G. (2017). Licensing, partnerships, and staged transfer in industrial technology adoption. International Journal of Technology Management, 75(4), 289–306.
  9. Reynolds, T., Sinclair, J., & Carter, M. (2006). Organizational collaboration and capability development in engineering-based industries. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(2), 121–142.
  10. Ruggieri, A., Braccini, A., & Poponi, S. (2019). Technology dependence and capability formation in resource-constrained industrial ecosystems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 1245–1257.
  11. Silva, M. (2023). Capital budgeting and discounted cash flow: Foundations for investment feasibility. International Review of Applied Economics, 37(1), 1
  12. Zhang, Y. (2022). The Effectiveness of NPV and IRR Used in Fundamental Financial Markets. International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2022). doi:https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220307.200
  13. Internet Source
  14. Corporate Finance Institute. (2025). Cash-on-cash return: Calculation and interpretation. Corporate Finance Institute Publications.
  15. J.P. Morgan. (2024). Private equity valuation metrics for capital deployment in industrial projects. J.P. Morgan Asset Management Insight Report.