mata788 PERMATA123 PERJAKA188 slot88resmi slot88resmi hati108 login Situs toto warga123 RAJAINDO permata123 Akunbos PERMATA123 jokijp slot88resmi slot88jp https://kl108gambar.com https://kl108gambar.com BMW777 Slot gacor seni108 hoki88 seni108

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): (Special Issue)
Articles

Business Strategies for PT Katalis Infra Indonesia to Expand Its Loan Portfolio in the Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Sector

PDF
  • Erick Mulijadi,
  • Utomo Sarjono Putro
Erick Mulijadi
School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung
Utomo Sarjono Putro
School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58229/jims.v3i2.398

Published 2025-08-03

Keywords

  • Electric vehicle infrastructure,
  • infrastructure finance,
  • business strategy,
  • TOWS matrix,
  • gap analysis,
  • key success factor
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Mulijadi, E., & Putro, U. S. (2025). Business Strategies for PT Katalis Infra Indonesia to Expand Its Loan Portfolio in the Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Sector. Journal Integration of Management Studies, 3(2), 382–396. https://doi.org/10.58229/jims.v3i2.398

Abstract

Indonesia has decided to achieve net-zero emissions by 2060, where electric vehicle (EV) adoption plays a critical role. PT Katalis Infra Indonesia (KII) – a pseudonym for a state-owned enterprise company that finances infrastructure projects in Indonesia – was given a mandate by the government to expand its operations to finance the EV infrastructure sector, comprising EV battery manufacturing plants and EV charging stations. Despite the recent mandate expansion, the company is struggling to finance a project related to this new sector. This study focuses on formulating business strategies for KII to expand its loan portfolio in the EV infrastructure sector. The study uses a qualitative method approach, starting from a literature review, benchmarking, document analysis, and semi-structured interviews with several key participants from internal and external stakeholders. The gathered data is analyzed with internal and external analysis, using several tools such as Resource-Based View (RBV) for internal analysis, Porter's Five Forces for external analysis, SWOT and TOWS matrix for strategy formulation, and gap analysis to evaluate the alignment of company capabilities with industry key success factors. The findings reveal several critical gaps with industry best practices and expectations, starting from the company's condition, which lacks technical expertise and specific credit evaluation tools in the EV infrastructure sector, limited green finance products in the new sector, and mandate expansion that does not cover key segments of the EV ecosystem. The strategy is formulated using the TOWS matrix, where each of the proposed strategies is linked with the identified gap of the company's capability and key success factors in the industry. The study concludes with an implementation roadmap and recommendations for KII regarding the key actionable solutions in implementing the strategies.

PDF

References

  1. Clean Energy Ministerial. (2015). Business models for electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Electric Vehicles Initiative. Retrieved from https://cleanenergyministerial.org
  2. Chen, C., Bartle, J.R. (2022). Innovative Mechanisms of Financing Infrastructure. In: Innovative Infrastructure Finance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91411-0_4
  3. Gupta, S., Sanjay, K., Sheikh, R., Kataria, A., & Haqqani, M. H. (2025). The role of green bonds in financing sustainable infrastructure projects: Evidence from global markets. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i2.3553
  4. Jurevicius, O. (2021). Resource-based view. Strategic Management Insight. Retrieved from https://strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/resource-based-view/
  5. Lamm T., Johnson M., Weisman C., Alatriste I. (2024). Funding, Financing, & Investment Strategies to Advance Clean Mobility Infrastructure in Priority Communities
  6. PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur. (2024). Annual Report 2024. Retrieved from https://www.ptsmi.co.id/annual-reports
  7. Rocky Mountain Institute. (2024). Clean mobility investment strategies. Retrieved from https://rmi.org
  8. Sheppard, Valerie A. (2021). Research Methods for The Social Sciences: An Introduction
  9. World Resources Institute. (2022). Innovative solution suggestions for financing electric vehicle charging infrastructure.
  10. Yang, T., Long, R., Li, W., & Rehman, S. U. (2016). Innovative application of the public–private partnership model to the electric vehicle charging infrastructure in China. Sustainability, 8(8), 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080738
  11. Industry Report and Government Regulation
  12. Asian Development Bank. (2023). Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure: Policy and Regulatory Guide. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/publications
  13. Baldwin, S., Myers, A., O’Boyle, M. (2020). Increasing Electric Vehicle Charging Access at Multi-Unit Dwellings: Workshop Summary Report.
  14. Institute for Essential Services Reform. (2023). Indonesia Electric Vehicle Outlook 2023. Retrieved from https://iesr.or.id
  15. International Finance Corporation. (2022). Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure: Unlocking Investment Opportunities. Retrieved from https://www.ifc.org
  16. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2024). POJK No. 16/2024: Perluasan Mandat Pembiayaan Infrastruktur Kendaraan Listrik.
  17. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2023). Charging Infrastructure Financing: Market Readiness Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.wbcsd.org
  18. World Bank. (2023). Indonesia Electric Mobility Outlook. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org

Most read articles by the same author(s)