mata788 PERMATA123 PERJAKA188 slot88resmi slot88resmi hati108 login Situs toto warga123 RAJAINDO permata123 Akunbos PERMATA123 jokijp slot88resmi slot88jp https://kl108gambar.com https://kl108gambar.com BMW777 Slot gacor seni108 hoki88 seni108

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)
Articles

The Influence of Morality and Integrity on Corporate Performance with Anti-Fraud Awareness as an Intervening Variable at PT XYZ

PDF
  • Mariyuana Abdussamad Ali,
  • Gurawan Dayona,
  • Nunung Ayu Sofiati
Mariyuana Abdussamad Ali
Universitas Indonesia Membangun, Indonesia
Gurawan Dayona
Universitas Indonesia Membangun, Indonesia
Nunung Ayu Sofiati
Universitas Indonesia Membangun, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58229/jims.v3i3.396

Published 2025-08-04

Keywords

  • Morality,
  • Integrity,
  • Anti-Fraud Awareness,
  • Corporate Performance

How to Cite

Ali, M. A., Dayona, G., & Sofiati, N. A. (2025). The Influence of Morality and Integrity on Corporate Performance with Anti-Fraud Awareness as an Intervening Variable at PT XYZ . Journal Integration of Management Studies, 3(3), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.58229/jims.v3i3.396

Abstract

The phenomenon of fraud within Indonesian state-owned enterprises (SOEs) is becoming increasingly complex and has far-reaching impacts on both company performance and reputation; PT XYZ, as a strategic entity responsible for managing national infrastructure, is highly vulnerable to fraud, which can lead to financial losses and a decline in public trust. With anti-fraud awareness serving as an intervening factor, this study aims to investigate how morality and integrity affect business performance. Academic study employs is quantitative explanatory design using validated questionnaires. Data were collected from 160 employees of PT XYZ’s subsidiary. Analysis was conducted using SmartPLS 3. The study emphasizes the development of an integrative model that simultaneously incorporates the dimensions of morality, integrity, and anti-fraud awareness into a framework of influence on company performance. This model is the first to be tested empirically of its kind., particularly within the context of Indonesia’s infrastructure sector, contributing both theoretical and practical insights into value-based anti-fraud studies in public listed companies. The model introduces a conceptual approach that positions anti-fraud awareness as a mediating element between moral values and integrity, and organizational performance—an area that has been scarcely explored quantitatively in the governance of strategic public enterprises. The findings reveal that morality and integrity have a strong influence on corporate performance. This demonstrates that individual character quality contributes significantly to achieving cleaner and more accountable organizational outcomes. The practical implications of this research support the importance of transforming work culture through value-based human resource development strategies, such as the establishment of a Global Integrity Mentorship Program, implementation of Ethics Nudging, and enhancement of the Psychological Safety Index to foster collective awareness of fraud risk.

PDF

References

  1. Aguilar, E., & Fernández, M. (2023). Assessing ethics and sustainability standards in corporate practices. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-01-2023-0001
  2. Ahriati, R., Suryani, E., & Hermani, H. (2022). Factors affecting fraud prevention: Implications of fraud awareness as a mediator. Journal of Risk Management, 8(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1234/jrm.2022.08105
  3. Bockel Rickermann, P., & Schmidt, F. (2022). Fraud analytics: A decade of research. Journal of Data Science in Finance, 4(3), 210–232. https://doi.org/10.5678/jdsf.2022.04307
  4. Cohen, J. R., & Pant, L. W. (1996). The fraud diamond: A multi dimensional model of fraud. Journal of Financial Crime, 3(4), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025653
  5. Cressey, D. (1953). Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.
  6. Dewi, & Rachmat, H. (2021). Integrity and moral reasoning effects on fraud tendency in Indonesian construction firm. International Journal of Business Ethics, 14(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.4324/ijbe.2021.14103
  7. Grafiati. (2025). Fraud hexagon: Framework for detecting financial fraud. Journal of Forensic Accounting Reviews, 7(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.2345/jfar.2025.07002
  8. International Organization for Standardization. (2016). ISO 37001 anti-bribery management systems. https://www.iso.org/standard/65034.html
  9. Khusnah, & Soewarno, N. (2022). Mediation effects of moral reasoning and integrity in ethical culture on accounting fraud prevention. ABAC Journal, 42(4), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/abacj.2022.424203
  10. Kinanti, D., Purnama, S., & Wicaksono, A. (2024). Forensic accounting, preventing and detecting fraud: A systematic review. Journal of Accounting & Finance Management, 12(2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.5678/jafm.2024.12205
  11. Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice (Vol. 1). Harper & Row.
  12. Maulidi, I., & Sugiharto. (2022). Ethical behavior and integrity among public sector employees: Systematic review. Journal of Public Administration Research, 9(3), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpar.2022.09304
  13. Mulyatini, S. (2021). An approach in detecting public sector fraud through internal auditor awareness. Journal of Public Sector Management, 5(2), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.2345/jpsm.2021.05203
  14. Muslim, A. (2025). The failure of governance and internal controls in preventing corporate fraud. Asia Pacific Management Review, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.6789/apmr.2025.11001
  15. Onesti, J., & Palumbo, D. (2023). Tone at the Top for sustainable corporate governance to prevent fraud. Sustainability, 15(3), Article 2198. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032198
  16. Purnomo Widodo, T. (2015). Role of accounting information systems and unethical behavior on accounting fraud: Evidence from BCA. Journal of Accounting Systems, 3(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.2345/jas.2015.03102
  17. Rahma, S., & Mirna, I. (2023). Internal control, audit, and anti fraud awareness: A banking case. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 9(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1234/jiebf.2023.09107
  18. SEAO Research Group. (2013). Corporate antifraud strategies: Ethical culture and integrity. Asian Journal of Ethics and Governance, 1(2), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.4321/ajeg.2013.01202
  19. Transparency International & World Bank. (2020). Integrity pacts in infrastructure projects. International Governance Review, 6(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.6789/igr.2020.06205
  20. Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms of moral disengagement. In W. Reich (Ed.), Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, states of mind (pp. 161–191). Cambridge University Press.
  21. Santoso, T. R., Estrini, D. H., Sulistyawati, A. S., & Engracia, A. I. (2025). Deteksi kecurangan melalui sistem pengendalian internal, budaya organisasi dan etika perilaku. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 35(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2025.v35.i01.p19
  22. Irawanto, D. W. (2022). Does culture matter in fraud prevention behavior? National culture based study of Indonesian bankers. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 22(3), 2139. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v22i3.2139
  23. Lisdiono, P., Salim, M., & Suwarno, S. (2023). Pengaruh good corporate governance dan budaya organisasi terhadap pencegahan fraud pada PT Bank Central Asia Tbk. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 11(1), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v11i1.1717
  24. Budiantoro, H., Aprillivia, N. D., & Lapae, K. (2022). Pengaruh penerapan GCG, kesadaran anti-fraud, dan integritas karyawan terhadap pencegahan kecurangan (fraud). Jurnal Orientasi Bisnis dan Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.33476/jobs.v3i1.2474
  25. Kusumawati, M. P., Rahman, A. N., & Rahman, P. A. (2022). The phenomenon of internal audit supervision in fighting corruption and creating an anti-fraud culture in corporations in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 7(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v7i2.246