mata788 PERMATA123 PERJAKA188 slot88resmi slot88resmi hati108 login Situs toto warga123 RAJAINDO permata123 Akunbos PERMATA123 jokijp slot88resmi slot88jp https://kl108gambar.com https://kl108gambar.com BMW777 Slot gacor seni108 hoki88 seni108
Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)
Articles

Evaluation and Strategic Recommendations for BRIN's RIIM Start-up Program

Adara Permata Halimatunnisa
Bandung Institute of Technology

Published 2025-07-09

Keywords

  • innovation,
  • business incubator,
  • startup readiness level,
  • research commercialization,
  • startup development

How to Cite

Adara Permata Halimatunnisa. (2025). Evaluation and Strategic Recommendations for BRIN’s RIIM Start-up Program. Journal Integration of Management Studies, 3(3), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.58229/jims.v3i3.379

Abstract

The study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) 's Research and Innovation for Indonesia Advanced (RIIM) program in promoting research commercialization, thereby bridging scientific research to the market through start-up incubation. This study employs a qualitative research approach through in-depth interviews with BRIN policymakers, qualitative questionnaires administered to 11 start-up graduates of the RIIM program, and secondary data analysis of participants' final reports. The analysis utilizes the TOWS matrix to develop strategic recommendations and the TOPSIS analysis to prioritize these strategies. The RIIM program yielded mixed results, with a technological readiness level (TRL) of 7.1/9 and a business readiness level (BRL) of 6.1/10. However, there are critical gaps in manufacturing readiness (MRL 5.9/10) and commercial readiness (CRL 5.6/9), indicating the 'valley of death'. Key limitations include inadequate physical infrastructure, mentors who prioritize administration over strategy, suboptimal post-incubation monitoring, inflexible funding structures, and limited networks with investors. This study provides empirical evidence on the effectiveness of government research commercialization programs in developing countries. Using TOPSIS analysis on the strategies derived from the TOWS matrix, five priority recommendations emerge: building incubation infrastructure through external partnerships, optimizing internal research teams, facilitating collaborative projects between researchers and start-ups, leveraging innovation focus to achieve competitive advantage, and establishing a comprehensive post-incubation monitoring system. This study presents new empirical evidence on the effectiveness of BRIN's RIIM program and gives recommendations that can scale up similar innovation programs, create jobs, strengthen national competitiveness, and address social challenges through local economic and technological development.

References

  1. Al-Shamaileh, I. A., Saatci, E. Y., & Eyamba, P. E. (2020). Impact of Business Incubators’ Facilities on Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Creation: A Case of Business Incubator in Jordan. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 10(1), 189. https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v10n1p189
  2. Amelia, T. N., Thoyib, A., Irianto, G., & Rofiq, A. (2021). Tech Start-up Incubation Program: Business Model Evaluation on Government Based Incubator in Indonesia. TEM Journal, 10(1), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM101-35
  3. Braun, S., & Suoranta, M. (2024). Incubating Innovation: The Role of Incubators in Supporting Business Model Innovation. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-01-2024-0028
  4. Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., Dicenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. In Oncology Nursing Forum (Vol. 41, Issue 5, pp. 545–547). Oncology Nursing Society. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
  5. Dewanto, D. (2022). TOWS matrix as business strategy of BP. Tapera. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 11(7), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i7.2137
  6. Dhiman, V., & Arora, M. (2024). What Lies in ‘Business Incubation and SMEs’ Research? A Literature Review and Roadmap for Future Research. Journal of Innovation and Management, 3(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/jinm.241245806
  7. Directorate of Research and Innovation Utilization in Ministries/Institutions, C. M. S. and M. E. (2024). PPBR/Start-up Incubation Activity Report of the Directorate of Research and Innovation Utilization in Ministries/Institutions, Communities, Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in 2024.
  8. Eveleens, C. P., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Niesten, E. M. M. I. (2017). How network-based incubation helps start-up performance: a systematic review against the background of management theories. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(3), 676–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9510-7
  9. Filipovic, A. M., Welo, T., & Oehmen, J. (2024). Developing readiness levels for risk assessment in green transition engineering projects. Proceedings of the Design Society, 4, 1239–1248. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2024.126
  10. Gerdsri, N., & Manotungvorapun, N. (2021). Readiness assessment for IDE start-ups: A pathway toward sustainable growth. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413687
  11. Halim, F. (2020). Digital-Based Incubator Framework Modelling for University. International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation (IJEEI), 10(1).
  12. Hassan, N. A. (2020). University business incubators as a tool for accelerating entrepreneurship: theoretical perspective. Review of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/reps-10-2019-0142
  13. Leitão, J., Pereira, D., & Gonçalves, Â. (2022). Business Incubators, Accelerators, and Performance of Technology-Based Ventures: A Systematic Literature Review. In Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity (Vol. 8, Issue 1). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010046
  14. Lyken-Segosebe, D., Montshiwa, B., Kenewang, S., & Mogotsi, T. (2020). Stimulating academic entrepreneurship through technology business incubation: Lessons for the incoming sponsoring university. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n5p1
  15. Madanchian, M., & Taherdoost, H. (2023). A comprehensive guide to the TOPSIS method for multi-criteria decision making. Sustainable Social Development, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.54517/ssd.v1i1.2220
  16. National Research and Innovation Agency. (2024, December 19). BRIN’s Vision, Mission, Goals and Strategic Targets. https://brin.go.id/page/7/visi-misi-tujuan-dan-sasaran-strategis-brin-1
  17. National Research and Innovation Agency. (2024). Decree of the Deputy for Utilization of National Research and Innovation Number 3/II.8/HK/2024 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of the Research-Based Start-up Incubation Process, Pub. L. No. 3/II.8/HK/2024.
  18. National Research and Innovation Agency. (2021). Regulation of the National Research and Innovation Agency Number 1 of 2021 About Organization and Work Procedures of the National Research and Innovation Agency, Pub. L. No. Regulation of the National Research and Innovation Agency Number 1 of 2021. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/267522/peraturan-brin-no-1-tahun-2021
  19. Skotnicka-Zasadzien, B., Zasadzies, M., & Grebski, W. (2023). Application of TOWS/SWOT Analysis as an Element of Strategic Management on the Example of a Manufacturing Company. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, 2023(189), 541–551. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2023.189.34
  20. Sudana, I. M., Apriyani, D., Supraptono, E., & Kamis, A. (2019). Business incubator training management model to increase graduate competency. Benchmarking, 26(3), 773–787. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-03-2018-0069
  21. Trott, P. (2020). Innovation Management and New Product Development Sixth Edition (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
  22. Zibarzani, M., & Rozan, M. Z. A. (2018). The role of knowledge sharing in business incubators performance. In Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies (Vol. 5, pp. 719–727). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59427-9_74