mata788 PERMATA123 PERJAKA188 slot88resmi slot88resmi hati108 login Situs toto warga123 RAJAINDO permata123 Akunbos PERMATA123 jokijp slot88resmi slot88jp https://kl108gambar.com https://kl108gambar.com BMW777 Slot gacor seni108 hoki88 seni108

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)
Articles

Heuristic Evaluation-Based User Interface Analysis and Redesign of the Talenesia Human Resource Information System Application

PDF
  • Amelia Anis Miranda,
  • Astri Ghina
Amelia Anis Miranda
Telkom University
Bio
Astri Ghina
Telkom University
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58229/jims.v3i3.386

Published 2025-08-01

Keywords

  • Digital Transformation,
  • Human Resources Information System,
  • User Interface,
  • Heuristic Evaluation,
  • Severity Ratings

How to Cite

Miranda, A. A., & Ghina, A. (2025). Heuristic Evaluation-Based User Interface Analysis and Redesign of the Talenesia Human Resource Information System Application. Journal Integration of Management Studies, 3(3), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.58229/jims.v3i3.386

Abstract

This study investigates the usability of the TALENESIA Human Resource Information System (HRIS) through Jakob Nielsen’s heuristic evaluation framework. The evaluation identified 34 usability issues, comprising five critical and 29 major problems. The most commonly violated heuristics included Visibility of System Status, Recognition Rather Than Recall, and Error Prevention, indicating significant barriers to user efficiency and satisfaction. To address these concerns, a series of interface redesigns was developed based on expert recommendations and user-centered design principles. The redesigned interfaces were subsequently validated through structured feedback sessions involving both usability experts and end users. The validation phase revealed that 85% of the proposed changes were fully approved, confirming the practical value of the improvements. These enhancements led to a more intuitive, responsive, and error-tolerant system experience for users. The study highlights the importance of heuristic evaluation as a diagnostic tool and demonstrates how iterative redesign—guided by usability principles—can significantly improve the effectiveness and user experience of HRIS platforms. Ultimately, the research offers both a methodological contribution to usability testing and practical insights for organizations seeking to optimize their digital HR systems.

PDF

References

  1. Apraiz, A., Mulet Alberola, J. A., Lasa, G., & Nguyen, H. N. (2023). Development of a new set of heuristics for the evaluation of human-robot interaction in industrial settings: Heuristics Robots Experience (HEUROBOX). Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 10, 1210933. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1210933
  2. Fitzgerald, E., Ferguson, R., Adams, A., Gaved, M., Mor, Y., & Thomas, R. (2013). Augmented reality and mobile learning: The state of the art. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 5(4), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.2013100103
  3. Forde. (2023, December 15). Statistik penggunaan HRIS di Indonesia. Retrieved July 25, 2025, from https://forde.co.id/id/statistik-penggunaan-hris-di-indonesia
  4. Jeffries, R., Miller, J. R., Wharton, C., & Uyeda, K. M. (1991, March). User interface evaluation in the real world: A comparison of four techniques. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 119–124). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/108844.108862
  5. Lif, P., Hermelin, J., Bengtsson, K., & Svensson, J. (2019). Heuristic evaluation conducted by end users. In Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference MCCSIS 2019 (pp. 279–286). IADIS Press.
  6. Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability inspection methods. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Nielsen, J. (1995). Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods (pp. 25–62). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Ningsih, E. P., & Widodo, W. (2017). The influence of task–technology fit and habitual use on job performance in Indonesian education industry: Innovative work behavior as a moderator. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 23, 1–12.
  9. Prastyo, D., & Bakhtiar, M. Y. (2019). Development of the Human Resources Information System (HRIS) based on usability analysis with Usefulness, Satisfaction, Ease to Use (USE) questionnaire and Cognitive Walkthrough methods. bit-Tech, 1(3), 148–160.
  10. Pratama, I. T., Putri, R., & Fernanda, R. (2022, November). The usability analysis of Human Resource Information System (HRIS) using usability scale system and concurrent think aloud. In 2022 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS) (pp. 270–275). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMCIS56491.2022.10041633
  11. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (5th ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  12. Sriwulandari, A., Hidayati, H., & Pudjoatmojo, B. (2014). Analisis dan evaluasi aspek usability pada web HRMIS Telkom University menggunakan usability testing. eProceedings of Engineering, 1(1), 41–48. Retrieved July 25, 2025, from https://openlibrarypublications.telkomuniversity.ac.id/index.php/engineering/article/view/163
  13. Stone, D., Jarrett, C., Woodroffe, M., & Minocha, S. (2009). User experience re-mastered: Your guide to getting the right design. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  14. Sutrisno, E. (2016). Manajemen sumber daya manusia (7th ed.). Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
  15. Talenta. (2024). Syarat sistem HRD yang baik. Retrieved July 25, 2025, from https://www.talenta.co/blog/syarat-sistem-hrd-yang-baik
  16. Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
  17. Yusuf, S. U., Taslim, J., Adnan, W. A. W., & Baharudin, S. K. (2024, September). Usability evaluation of Human Resource Management Information System (HRMIS). In 2024 3rd International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr) (pp. 204–209). IEEE.