mata788 PERMATA123 PERJAKA188 slot88resmi slot88resmi hati108 login Situs toto warga123 RAJAINDO permata123 Akunbos PERMATA123 jokijp slot88resmi slot88jp https://kl108gambar.com https://kl108gambar.com BMW777 Slot gacor seni108 hoki88 seni108
Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): (Special Issue)
Articles

Unveiling the Relationship Between Sustainability Certification and Zero Deforestation on Financial Performance in Crude Palm Oil Plantation

Ruth Tesalonika Sinaga
School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung
Yunieta Nainggolan
School of Business Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Published 2025-06-10

Keywords

  • sustainability certification,
  • zero deforestation commitments,
  • financial performance,
  • panel data regression,
  • logistic regression

How to Cite

Sinaga, R. T., & Nainggolan, Y. (2025). Unveiling the Relationship Between Sustainability Certification and Zero Deforestation on Financial Performance in Crude Palm Oil Plantation. Journal Integration of Management Studies, 3(2), 294–317. https://doi.org/10.58229/jims.v3i2.342

Abstract

The purpose of this research study is to investigate the relationship between key financial performance indicators and financial leverage in decision-making for achieving sustainable performance, as measured by sustainability certification and zero deforestation, in the palm oil industries of Indonesia and Malaysia from 2021 to 2023. This study employs panel data regression and logistic regression, using data from 25 palm oil plantations in Indonesia and Malaysia from 2021 to 2023. The data analysis was conducted using STATA software to process and interpret the multiple regression models. This research employs a dual-lens empirical framework, focusing on sustainable certification and zero deforestation. The results reveal that financial performance has a negative, yet insignificant, relationship with sustainable certification and zero deforestation. Confirming that sustainable practices do not heavily rely on financial structure. Nonetheless, financial leverage has a negative insignificant relationship with sustainable certification or zero deforestation. This suggests that a higher debt ratio is associated with a lower likelihood of adopting sustainable practices. Otherwise, other independent variables, such as liquidity, firm size, and ESG score in zero deforestation, have a positive and significant association, suggesting that larger firms with capital flexibility and a high ESG score are more likely to comply with the zero deforestation policy. For sustainable certification, only the ESG score shows a positive and significant association with sustainable certification. This suggests that palm oil plantations with consistently high ESG scores are more likely to obtain sustainable certification. This research provides broad insight for organizations related to sustainability and managerial insights to support the transparency and credibility of reporting sustainable performance of palm oil plantations in Indonesia and Malaysia.

References

  1. Almajali, A. Y., Alamro, S. A., & Al-Soub, Y. Z. (2012). Factors Affecting the Financial Performance of Jordanian Insurance Companies Listed at Amman Stock Exchange. Journal of Management Research, 4(2), 266–289. https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v4i2.1482
  2. Ambarish, R., John, K., & Williams, J. (1987). Efficient signalling with dividends and investments. The Journal of Finance, 42(2), 321–343.
  3. Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012). Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study based on the top global corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1063-y
  4. B.A.M, H.-S., Shahida, S., & Fuad, S. . (2018). Sustainability Certifications and Financial Profitability: An Analysis on POCs in Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan, 143–154.
  5. Balasubramanian, Sreejith., Vinaya Shukla, ., Sachin Mangla, .J, & anya Chanchaichujit, . (2020). Do firm characteristics affect environmental sustainability? A literature review-based assessment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1389–1416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2692
  6. Bouslah, K., M’Zali, B., Turcotte, M. F., & Kooli, M. (2010). The Impact of Forest Certification on Firm Financial Performance in Canada and the U.S. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 551–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0482-5
  7. Bouwens, J., De Kok, T., & Verriest, A. (2019). The prevalence and validity of EBITDA as a performance measure. Comptabilite Controle Audit, 25(1), 55–105. https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.251.0055
  8. Cantele, S., & Zardini, A. (2018). Is sustainability a competitive advantage for small businesses? An empirical analysis of possible mediators in the sustainability–financial performance relationship. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.016
  9. Carlson, K. M., Heilmayr, R., Gibbs, H. K., Noojipady, P., Burns, D. N., Morton, D. C., Walker, N. F., Paoli, G. D., & Kremen, C. (2018). Effect of oil palm sustainability certification on deforestation and fire in Indonesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(1), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704728114
  10. Chain Reaction Research. (2020). NDPE policies cover 83% of palm oil refneries; implementation at 78%.
  11. Chandra, A., Garrett, R. D., Carlson, K. M., Heilmayr, R., Stigler, M., Benedict, J. J., & Grabs, J. (2024). How well does the implementation of corporate zero-deforestation commitments in Indonesia align with aims to halt deforestation and include smallholders? Environmental Research Letters, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad33d1
  12. Chatterji, A. K., Rodolphe Durand., David I. Levine, ., & Samuel Touboul. (2015). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1597–1614. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2407
  13. Christopher, L. G. (2024). The Likely Impacts of the EU Deforestation Regulation. Research in Agricultural & Applied Economics, 18. file:///F:/Spec 2/Traffic Delay Model.pdf
  14. Clark, Feiner, & VIews. (2015). From The Sttockholder to the stakehoolder. March. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2508281HOWSUSTAINABILITYCANDRIVEFINANCIALOUTPERFORMANCEElectroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2508281
  15. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.013
  16. Connors, E., & Gao, L. S. (2011). Corporate Environmental Performance , Disclosure and Leverage : An Integrated Approach. International Review of Accounting, Banking & Finance, 3(3), 1–32.
  17. Cormier, D., Ledoux, M. J., & Magnan, M. (2011). The informational contribution of social and environmental disclosures for investors. Management Decision, 49(8), 1276–1304.
  18. Curtis, P. G., Slay, C. M., Harris, N. L., Tyukavina, A., & & Hansen, M. C. (2018). Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science, 361(6407), 1108–1111.
  19. Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment valuation: Tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset. John Wiley & Sons.
  20. Davidsson, P., Steffens, P., & Fitzsimmons, J. (2009). Growing profitable or growing from profits: Putting the horse in front of the cart? Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.003
  21. de Vos, R. E., Suwarno, A., Slingerland, M., van der Meer, P. J., & Lucey, J. M. (2023). Pre-certification conditions of independent oil palm smallholders in Indonesia. Assessing prospects for RSPO certification. Land Use Policy, 130(April), 106660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106660
  22. Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027–1055.
  23. Demiraj, R., Dsouza, S., & Demiraj, E. (2023). ESG scores relationship with firm performance: panel data evidence from the European tourism industry. Pressacademia, 116–120. https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1674
  24. Duojun, He, ., Shenggang, Ren, ., & Huixiang, Z. (2021). Environmental labeling certification and firm environmental and financial performance: A resource management perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 751–767. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2915
  25. Dzeraviaha, I. (2022). The impact of firm size on environmental sustainability: The assessment based on the analysis of cost structure. Business Strategy and Development. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.221
  26. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
  27. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.
  28. FAO. (2016). Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Forests and Agriculture: Land-use Challenges and Opportunities.
  29. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
  30. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
  31. Galbreath, J. (2010). How does corporate social responsibility benefit firms? Evidence from Australia. European Business Review, 22(4), 411–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341011056186
  32. GARP. (2015). Asset and Liability Management (2nd ed.).
  33. Gilbert, C. L. (2024). The EU Deforestation Regulation. EuroChoices, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12436
  34. Godfrey, PC., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425–445.
  35. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.
  36. Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. . (2009). Basic Econometrics.
  37. Gujarati, D. (2003). Basic Econometrics. In McGraw-Hill.
  38. Hidayat, ., Kurniawati Nia, ., Glasbergen, ., Pieter, ., Offermans, . &, & Astrid. (2015). Sustainability Certification and Palm Oil Smallholders’ Livelihood: A Comparison between Scheme Smallholders and Independent Smallholders in Indonesia. International Food and Agribusiness Management Association (IFAMA), 18(3), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.208400
  39. Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. Stata Journal, 7(3), 281–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0700700301
  40. Hosonuma, N., Herold, M., De Sy, V., De Fries, R. S., Brockhaus, M., Verchot, L., Angelsen, A., & Romijn, E. (2012). An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environmental Research Letters, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044009
  41. Humphreys, D., Singer, B., Mcginley, K., Smith, R., Budds, J., Gabay, M., Bhagwat, S., Jong, W. De, Newing, H., & Cross, C. (2019). SDG 17 : Partnerships for the Goals – Focus on Forest Finance and Partnerships. Cambridge University Press, 541–576.
  42. Hutabarat, S., Slingerland, M., Rietberg, P., & Dries, L. (2018). Costs and benefits of certification of independent oil palm smallholders in Indonesia. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 21(6), 681–700. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2016.0162
  43. Jayachandran, S. (2013). Liquidity constraints and deforestation: The limitations of payments for ecosystem services. American Economic Review, 103(3), 309–313.
  44. Jha, P., & Kumar Mittal, S. (2024). The nexus between financing pattern, firm-specific factors, and financial performance: Panel evidence of listed SMEs in India. IIMB Management Review, 36(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2024.02.001
  45. Jum’a, L., Zimon, D., Sroufe, R., & Tyan, J. (2024). Sustainable supply chain management’s impact on triple bottom line performance: Does the firm size matter? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, March, 4673–4693. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2826
  46. Kachalov, D., & Finogenova, Y. (2023). Enhancing Investment Attractiveness Through Esg Ratings: a Sustainable Development Perspective in the Banking, Electric Utilities and Ipp Industries. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v11i1.258
  47. Lakshmy Naidu, Ravichandran Moorthy, & Mohd Ikbal Mohd Huda. (2022). THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND HEALTH SUSTAINABILITY CHALLENGES OF MALAYSIAN PALM OIL IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 36, 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21894/jopr.2022.0072
  48. Lambin, E.F., Gibbs, H.K., & Heilmayr, R. et al. (2018). The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation. Nature Climate Change, 8, 109–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0061-1
  49. Levy, S. A. (2022). Can companies end deforestation? The limitations and potential opportunities of zero-deforestation commitments in the Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado. 28271, 282. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000539299
  50. Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785–1824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505
  51. Loewe, M., & Zintl, T. (2021). State Fragility, Social Contracts and the Role of Social Protection: Perspectives from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region. Social Sciences, 10(12), 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10120447
  52. Lozano, R., & Huisingh, D. (2011). Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(2–3), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.004
  53. Mabahwi, N. A. B., Leh, O. L. H., & Omar, D. (2014). Human Health and Wellbeing: Human Health Effect of Air Pollution. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.056
  54. MPOB. (2016). Malaysian oil palm statistics 2015 (Vol. 35).
  55. Muhammad, A. Q., Sina, K., Kim, Theresa, ., & Tanveer, A. (2019). The impact of sustainability (environmental, social, and governance) disclosure and board diversity on firm value: The moderating role of industry sensitivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1199–1214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2427
  56. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.
  57. Naidu, L., Moorthy, R., & Huda, M. I. M. (2024). The Environmental and Health Sustainability Challenges of Malaysian Palm Oil in the European Union. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 36(1), 1–15.
  58. Ng, A. C., & Rezaee, Z. (2015). Business sustainability performance and cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 34, 128–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.08.003
  59. Norlin, Khalid, ., Nor, Aida Abdul Rahman, ., Cheah, Wai Yan, ., & Zainab, I. (2025). The Palm Oil Export Market: Trends, Challenges, and Future Strategies for Sustainability. Taylor & Francis.
  60. Olaf, Weber, ., Thomas, Koellner, ., Dominique, Habegger, ., Henrik, Steffensen., & Peter, O. (2008). The relation between the GRI indicators and the financial performance of firms. 5(4), 236–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/PIE.2008.019127
  61. Oosterveer, P., Adjei, B. E., Vellema, S., & Slingerland, M. (2014). Global sustainability standards and food security: Exploring unintended effects of voluntary certification in palm oil. Global Food Security, 3(3–4), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2014.09.006
  62. Openko, I., Shevchenko, O., Tykhenko, R., Tsvyakh, O., & Stepchuk, Y. (2019). Economic analysis of deforestation impact on the yield of agricultural cultures in Ukraine. Scientific Papers Series - Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 19(4), 233–237.
  63. Orlitzky, M., Frank L. Schmidt, ., & Sara L. Rynes. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. European Group for Organization Studies, 24(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
  64. Pacheco, P., Gnych, S., Dermawan, A., Komarudin, H., & Okarda, B. (2017). The palm oil global value chain: Implications for economic growth and socialand environmental sustainability.
  65. Park, H. M. (2015). Univariate analysis and normality test using SAS, Stata, and SPSS.
  66. Pedreira Luchese, G., & Sevilla Vaccarezza, M. (2023). From Pastures to Plates: the thorny path to achieving deforestation-free cattle from Brazil to European consumers. Ecological Economics, 230(January), 108524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108524
  67. Penrose, E. T. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford university press.
  68. Qian, G., & Li, L. (1999). Technology industry success : Strategic options for small. Business Horizons, 46(5), 41–46.
  69. Rajan, S. C. (2014). Governing the Common Firm: The Evolution of Environmental Policy for Small Businesses in India. Environmental Policies in ASIA, 135–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814590488_0008
  70. Renner, S., Ruml, A., Lakemann, T., Nuryartono, N., Tjoa, A., Corre, M. D., & Lay, J. (2024). Smallholder RSPO certification, economic benefits and agrochemical use. Environmental Research Letters , 19(11). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad8367
  71. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
  72. Ruysschaert, D., & Salles, D. (2014). Towards global voluntary standards: Questioning the effectiveness in attaining conservation goals. The case of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). Ecological Economics, 107, 438–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.016
  73. S. C. Patricio, A. J. Q. Sarnaglia, F. A. F. M. and P. H. S. M. A. (2021). Oxygen Uptake Plateau Diagnosis Using a New Developed Segmented Regression Estimation Method for Autocorrelated Data. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 68(11), 3281–3289. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3069458
  74. Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. L. (2010). Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders? Journal of World Business, 45(4), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.002
  75. Schneider, A., Hommel, G., & Blettner, M. (2010). Lineare regressionsanalyse - Teil 14 der serie zur bewertung wissenschaftlicher publikationen. Deutsches Arzteblatt, 107(44), 776–782. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2010.0776
  76. Semenova, N., & Hassel, L. G. (2015). On the Validity of Environmental Performance Metrics. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2323-4
  77. Setiyanto, A. (2024). Assessing the implications of implementing European Union countries’ anti-deforestation regulations on Indonesia’s palm oil industry. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1308(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1308/1/012066
  78. Shahida, S., Hafizuddin-Syah, B. A. M., & Fuad, S. H. (2018). The effect of sustainability certification for export on operational profitability of Malaysian palm oil companies. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 52(2). https://doi.org/10.17576/jem-2018-5202-5
  79. Shahimi, S., Hafizuddin-Syah, B. A. M., & S.F, H. (2023). Sustainability Practices and Financial Profitability: The Case of the World’s Top 20 Crude Palm Oil Producers. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231203832
  80. Sheikh, S. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm leverage: The impact of market competition. Research in International Business and Finance, 48(May 2018), 496–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.11.002
  81. Sheridan, M., Moore, C., & Nobbs, K. (2006). Fast fashion requires fast marketing: The role of category management in fast fashion positioning. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 10(3), 301–315.
  82. Shou, Y., Shao, J., Lai, K. hung, Kang, M., & Park, Y. (2019). The impact of sustainability and operations orientations on sustainable supply management and the triple bottom line. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118280
  83. Slaper, T. F., & Hall, T. J. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work. Indiana Business Review, 86(1), 4–8.
  84. Spence, M. (2002). Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review, 92(3), 434–459.
  85. Srinivasan, A., Mishra, A., & Kumar-M, P. (2024). R for Basic Biostatistics in Medical Research. In R for Basic Biostatistics in Medical Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-6980-3
  86. Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478.
  87. Sukiennik, M. (2012). the Analysis of Mining Company Liquidity Indicators. AGH Journal of Mining and Geoengineering, 36(3), 339–344.
  88. Suroso, A. I., Tandra, H., & Wahyudi, I. (2021). The Impact of Sustainable Certification on Financial and Market Performance: Evidence from Indonesian Palm Oil Companies. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 16(8), 1495–1500. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160810
  89. Suroso, A. I., Tandra, H., & Wahyudi, I. (2022). The Determinant of Sustainable Certification Adoption in Indonesia Palm Oil Industry. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(3), 1001–1006. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170331
  90. Susilawati, Ambarwati, S., & Prakoso, R. (2022). The Effect of Leverage and Good Corporate Governance on Sustainability Report Disclosure. International Journal of Science and Society, 4(4), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v4i4.553
  91. Tay, R. (2017). Correlation, Variance Inflation and Multicollinearity in Regression Model. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 12, 2006–2015.
  92. Teoh, C. H. (2010). Key sustainability issues in the palm oil sector.
  93. Tome, D. F. A. C. (2017). Financial Leverage and Investment decisions: Evidence from Portuguese listed Companies. 34.
  94. Urugo, M. M., Worku, M., Tola, Y. B., & Gemede, H. F. (2025). Ethiopian coffee: Production systems, geographical origin traceability, and European Union deforestation regulation directive compliance. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 19(August 2024), 101695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101695
  95. Wan Mustapa, W. N. binti, Hayat, N., Fazal, S. A., Al Mamun, A., Salameh, A. A., & Zainol, N. R. (2022). Modeling the Significance of Sustainability Orientation on the Sustainability Performance of Micro-Enterprises in an Emerging Economy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(May). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.881086
  96. Widarwati, E., Tinggi, S., Ekonomi, I., Subang, S., Susandy, G., Tinggi, S., & Ekonomi, I. (2023). Corporate Sustainability Performance during Pandemic : The Role of Leverage and Profitability Corporate Sustainability Performance during Pandemic : The Role of Leverage and Profitability. December.
  97. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.
  98. Xin Yang, Jingwei Bao, & Kezhen Zhang. (2025). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and abnormal positive tone. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 16(2), 351–388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2024-0045