The Relationship of Cultural Intelligence, Student’s Innovative Work Behavior and The Influence of Interpersonal Trust

Case Study of Indonesian International Student Mobility Awards

Authors

  • Feodora Putri Humaira Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Nur Arief Rahmatsyah Putranto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58229/jims.v1i2.102

Keywords:

cultural intelligence, innovation, interpersonal trust, human capital

Abstract

Rapidly shifting market due to globalization increases the nation's demand for young innovators. Innovators from Generation Z are needed to support the future growth of Indonesia. There are several Indonesian Government initiatives to elevate Indonesian education to grow innovations, such as establishing an international student mobility scholarship program. However, research on how the program can increase innovative work behavior for Indonesian students is still unclear. This research aims to investigate how Indonesian students perceive the impact of international student mobility on their innovative work behavior, focusing on the role of cultural intelligence and its effect on innovative work behavior through interpersonal trust. A quantitative approach was adopted for this study to examine the relationships between the variables with the assistance of SmartPLS 4.0 software. An online questionnaire was distributed to 302 respondents consisting of Indonesian students who had completed the Indonesian International Student Mobility Awards program in 2022 from all host country regions. This study demonstrates that students with higher cultural intelligence positively influence their individual innovative work behavior. Interpersonal trust also influences the process as a mediating role in the relationship between cultural intelligence and innovative work behavior among students in multicultural environments. This study can be a reference for future research and stakeholders to improve education quality by focusing on the impact of cultural intelligence on students' innovative work behavior in the context of cross-cultural interaction, specifically Indonesian students that participate in international student mobility programs from the Indonesian government. Such research has not been explored extensively beforehand, making this study valuable addition to the pedagogy and management science field.

References

Afsar, B., Al-Ghazali, B., Cheema, S., & Javed, F. (2020). Cultural intelligence and innovative work behavior: the role of work engagement and interpersonal trust. European Journal of Innovation Management.

Afsar, B., Badir, Y., & Saeed, B. (2014). Transformational leadership and innovative work. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 1270-1300.

Ang, S., & Dyne, L. V. (2007). Conceptualization of Cultural Intelligence Definition, Distinctiveness and Nomological Network. In Handbook of Cultural Intelligence Theory, Measurement and Applications. London, England: M.E.Sharpe.

Ang, S., Dyne, L. V., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, A. (2007). Cultural Intelligence: Its Measurement and Effects on Cultural Judgment and Decision Making, Cultural Adaptation and Task Performance. Management and Organization Review, 335-371.

Bogilović, S., Černe, M., & Škerlavaj, M. (2017). Hiding behind a mask? cultural intelligence, knowledge hiding, and individual and team creativity. European Journal Of Work And Organizational Psychology.

Borum, R. (2010). The Science of Interpersonal Trust. Mental Health Law & Policy Faculty Publications.

Chen, Y., Yu, C., Yuan, Y., Lu, F., & Shen, W. (2021). The Influence of Trust on Creativity: A Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.

Child, J. (2001). Trust: The fundamental bond in global collaboration. Organizational Dynamics, 45-64.

Chin, W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295-358). Erlbaum.

Chua, R. Y., Morris, M. W., & Mor, S. (2012). Collaborating across cultures: Cultural metacognition and affect-based trust in creative collaboration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 116-131.

Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Leon, L. R., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.

Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. (2011). Entrepreneur behaviors, opportunity recognition, and the origins of innovative ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 317-338.

Earley, P., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 26-49.

Etikariena, A. (2017). Analisis efek mediasi identitas organisasi dan kesiapan karyawan untuk berinovasi pada hubungan antara memori organisasi dengan perilaku kerja inovatif. Universitas Indonesia.

Etikariena, A. (2020). Encouraging innovative work behavior among college students through quality education to succeed the SDGs. The 1st JESSD Symposium: International Symposium of Earth, Energy, Environmental Science and Sustainable Development 2020, 211.

Gillespe, J. (2002). Colleges need better ways to assess study abroad programs. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/colleges-need-better-ways-to-assess-study-abroad-programs/

GÖKTEN, Ö., & EMİL, S. (2019). Exploring the Effect of Erasmus Program on Cultural Intelligence of University Students. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34(3), 769-789.

Gooden, D., Creque, C., & Chin-Loy, C. (2017). The Impact Of Metacognitive, Cognitive And Motivational Cultural Intelligence On Behavioral Cultural Intelligence. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 16(3).

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., Danks, M. S., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31, 2-24.

Hair, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26, 106-121.

Helmy, I., & Pratama, M. P. (2018). Effect of proactive personality and psychological empowerment on innovative behavior through creative self efficacy. Jurnal Pro Bisnis, 182-209.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.

IISMA. (2023). Sosialisasi IISMA 2023 ke LLDIKTI [Video]. Retrieved March 9, 2023, from YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muqPwYN4PSA&t=3555s&ab_channel=IISMA

Jayani, D. H. (2021, May). Proporsi Populasi Generasi Z dan Milenial Terbesar di Indonesia. Retrieved from Databoks: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/05/24/proporsi-populasi-generasi-z-dan-milenial-terbesar-di-indonesia

Johan, M. (2021). The Effect of Knowledge Sharing and Interpersonal Trust on Innovation: An Empirical Study in Indonesia Higher Education. International Journal of Social And Management Studies (IJOSMAS), 106-122.

Jong, J. d., & Hartog, D. d. (2010). Measuring Innovative Work Behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23-36.

Kemendikbud. (2020). Tentang Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka. Retrieved from Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka: https://kampusmerdeka.kemdikbud.go.id/web/about/tujuan

Kemendikbud. (2022). Indonesian Students Enthusiastic To Register For The IISMA Program. Retrieved from https://partnership.kemdikbud.go.id/article/read/indonesian-students-enthusiastic-to-register-for-the-iisma-program

Kemendikbud RI. (2020). Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 Year 2020 Concerning the National Standards of Higher Education. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia.

Kistyanto, A., Rahman, M. F., Wisandiko, F. A., & Setyawati, E. E. (2021). Cultural intelligence increase student's innovative behavior. International Journal of Educational Management.

Klafehn, J., Banerjee, P. M., & Chiu, C.-y. (2008). Navigating Cultures The Role of Metacognitive Cultural Intelligence. In S. Ang, & L. V. Dyne, Handbook of Cultural Intelligence. New York: M. E. Sharpe.

Lowry, P. B., & Gaskin, J. (2014). Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to choose it and how to use it. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57(2), 123-146.

Mariz Pérez, R. M., Teijeiro Alvarez, M. M., & García Alvarez, M. T. (2012). The relevance of human capital as a driver for innovation. Cuadernos de economía, 68-76.

McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. The Academy of Management Journal.

McKinsey & Company. (2023). What is Gen Z? Retrieved July 2023, from https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-gen-z

Ng, K., Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Ryan, A. (2012). Cultural intelligence: a review, reflections, and recommendations for future research. Conducting Multinational Research: Applying Organizational Psychology in the Workplace, 29-58.

Ogbeibu, S., Jabbour, C. J., Gaskin, J., Senadjki, A., & Hughes, M. (2020). Leveraging STARA competencies and green creativity to boost green organisational innovative evidence: A praxis for sustainable development. Business Strategy and The Environment.

Paras, A., Carignan, M., Brenner, A., Hardy, J., Malmgren, J., & Rathburn, M. (2019). Understanding How Program Factors Influence Intercultural Learning in Study Abroad. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 31(1).

Redaksi Suara Mahasiswa. (2023). Beda Tujuan Beda Impresi, IISMA untuk Ilmu atau Jalan-Jalan Semata? Retrieved from https://suaramahasiswa.com/beda-tujuan-beda-impresi-iisma-untuk-ilmu-atau-jalan-jalan-semata

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(7), 580–607.

Thien, L., Thurasamy, R., & N, A. R. (2014). Specifying and assessing a formative measure for Hofstede's cultural values: A Malaysian study. Quality & Quantity, 48(6), 3327–3342.

Turner, J. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (2002). Winning Through Innovation. Boston: HBR Press.

Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., Ng, K. Y., Rockstuhl, T., Tan, M. L., & Koh, C. (2012). Sub-dimensions of the four factor model of cultural intelligence: Expanding the conceptualization and measurement of cultural intelligence. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(4), 295–313.

Yamin, S. (2023). Olah Data Statistik: SmartPLS 4 Mudah & Praktis (3rd ed.). Bekasi: PT Dewangga Energi Internasional.

Zhong, X., & Liu, Z. (2014). Studies on creativity enhancement of contemporary college students. Proceedings Of The 3rd International Conference On Science And Social Research.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-15

How to Cite

Feodora Putri Humaira, & Nur Arief Rahmatsyah Putranto. (2023). The Relationship of Cultural Intelligence, Student’s Innovative Work Behavior and The Influence of Interpersonal Trust: Case Study of Indonesian International Student Mobility Awards. Journal Integration of Management Studies, 1(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.58229/jims.v1i2.102

Issue

Section

Articles