mata788 PERMATA123 PERJAKA188 slot88resmi slot88resmi hati108 login Situs toto warga123 RAJAINDO permata123 Akunbos PERMATA123 jokijp slot88resmi slot88jp https://kl108gambar.com https://kl108gambar.com BMW777 Slot gacor seni108 hoki88 seni108
Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025)
Articles

The Analysis of Carbon Credit Monetization in the Mining & Energy Company

Patrick Demario
School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung
Yunieta Anny Nainggolan
School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Published 2025-05-21

Keywords

  • Carbon Market,
  • Carbon Accounting,
  • Emissions Trading System,
  • Green Finance,
  • Mining and Energy

How to Cite

Demario, P., & Nainggolan, Y. A. (2025). The Analysis of Carbon Credit Monetization in the Mining & Energy Company. Journal Integration of Management Studies, 3(1), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.58229/jims.v3i1.328

Abstract

This study examines the recently launched Indonesian carbon market, IDX Carbon, with a focus on its applicability to publicly listed mining and energy companies. The research compares IDX Carbon with established carbon trading systems in the European Union and China to assess structural differences and pricing mechanisms. Using emissions data from 2020 to 2023, the study calculates annual emission surpluses and deficits based on Phase 1 carbon accounting. Findings reveal that most Indonesian companies are in a carbon credit deficit, resulting in added operational costs. Although the potential for monetizing carbon credits exists, particularly for companies with emission surpluses, the overall financial benefit remains limited under current market conditions. Notably, the price per ton of CO₂e in Indonesia is significantly lower than in the EU and China, indicating that the Indonesian carbon market is still undervalued and lacks liquidity. These conditions may discourage active participation and weaken the market’s role in driving corporate decarbonization. This research contributes to the understanding of early-stage carbon market implementation in developing economies and highlights areas for improvement in regulatory design, carbon pricing, and reporting transparency. It also provides a basis for future studies on sustainable finance and carbon policy reform in Indonesia, especially in high-emission sectors like mining and energy.

References

  1. Journal Article:
  2. Anjos, M. F., Feijoo, F., & Sankaranarayanan, S. (2022). A multinational carbon-credit market integrating distinct national carbon allowance strategies. Applied Energy, 319, 119181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119181
  3. Bandyopadhyay, S., & Maiti, S. K. (2022). Steering restoration of coal mining degraded ecosystem to achieve sustainable development goal-13 (climate action): United Nations Decade of Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(59), 88383–88409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23699-x
  4. De Salles, A. A., & Lima, R. B. (2024). Carbon Credits and Crude Oil: An Investigation of the Price Returns Interaction in the International Market. Naše Gospodarstvo/Our Economy, 70(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/ngoe-2024-0001
  5. Edmonds, J., Nichols, C., Adamantiades, M., Bistline, J., Huster, J., Iyer, G., Johnson, N., Patel, P., Showalter, S., Victor, N., Waldhoff, S., Wise, M., & Wood, F. (2020). Could congressionally mandated incentives lead to deployment of large-scale CO2 capture, facilities for enhanced oil recovery CO2 markets and geologic CO2 storage? Energy Policy, 146, 111775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111775
  6. Hongxiang, X., Wei, W., Bin, S., Iibo, L., Yijun, C., Jiushuai, D., Jiahua, C., Jingzheng, W., Yuntao, K., & Xin, S. (2024). Research on carbon emission accounting and carbon emission reduction path of coal preparation plant. Minerals Engineering, 217, 108955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2024.108955
  7. International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP. (2024). Carbon Pricing in the Power Sector: Role and design for transitioning toward net-zero carbon development. Washington DC: World Bank.
  8. Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh (2001). "Ecological Economics: Themes, Approaches, and Differences with Environmental Economics," Regional Environmental Change
  9. Kreibich, N., & Hermwille, L. (2021). Caught in between: Credibility and feasibility of the voluntary carbon market post-2020. Climate Policy, 21(7), 939–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1948384
  10. Luo, W., Zhang, Y., Gao, Y., Liu, Y., Shi, C., & Wang, Y. (2021). Life cycle carbon cost of buildings under carbon trading and carbon tax system in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 66, 102509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102509
  11. Makondo, C. C. (2023). Green growth, sustainability, and decoupling carbon emissions from industrial activities in emerging economies: A focus on Zambia’s energy sector. The Extractive Industries and Society, 14, 101271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101271
  12. Malahayati, M., & Masui, T. (2021). Potential impact of introducing emission mitigation policies in Indonesia: How much will Indonesia have to spend? Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 26(8), 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-021-09973-2
  13. National Research Council. (2002). Evolutionary and Revolutionary Technologies for Mining. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.17226/10318
  14. Pan, C., Shrestha, A. K., Wang, G., Innes, J. L., Wang, K. X., Li, N., Li, J., He, Y., Sheng, C., & Niles, J.-O. (2021). A Linkage Framework for the China National Emission Trading System (CETS): Insight from Key Global Carbon Markets. Sustainability, 13(13), 7459. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137459
  15. Pollitt, M. G., & Kong Chyong, C. (2022). Modelling Net Zero and Sector Coupling: Lessons for European Policy Makers. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.10.2.mpol
  16. Purnamasari, B. D., & Nurachmah, A. E. (2023). The fair and acceptable implementation of carbon market in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1267(1), 012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1267/1/012034
  17. Qi, S., Cheng, S., & Cui, J. (2021). Environmental and economic effects of China’s carbon market pilots: Empirical evidence based on a DID model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123720
  18. Rajbhandari, S., Winyuchakrit, P., Pradhan, B. B., Chaichaloempreecha, A., Pita, P., & Limmeechokchai, B. (2024). Thailand’s net-zero emissions by 2050: Analysis of economy-wide impacts. Sustainability Science, 19(1), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01319-y
  19. Safiullah, M., Kabir, Md. N., & Miah, M. D. (2021). Carbon emissions and credit ratings. Energy Economics, 100, 105330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105330
  20. Sapkota, Y., & White, J. R. (2020). Carbon offset market methodologies applicable for coastal wetland restoration and conservation in the United States: A review. Science of The Total Environment, 701, 134497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134497
  21. Wang, L., Shi, Z., Dai, W., Zhu, L., Wang, X., Cong, H., Shi, T., & Liu, Q. (2022). Two-stage stochastic planning for integrated energy systems accounting for carbon trading price uncertainty. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 143, 108452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108452
  22. Xu, L., Solangi, Y. A., & Wang, R. (2023). Evaluating and prioritizing the carbon credit financing risks and strategies for sustainable carbon markets in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137677
  23. Xu, Z., & Wu, Y. (2023). Environmental economic co-benefits and offsets effects of China’s unified energy-carbon market. Journal of Environmental Management, 331, 117268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117268
  24. Yin, J., Zhu, Y., & Fan, X. (2021). Correlation analysis of China’s carbon market and coal market based on multi-scale entropy. Resources Policy, 72, 102065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102065
  25. Yue, W., Zhang, L., & Li, T. (2024). Sustainability in the metallic minerals industry: The imperative for carbon accounting - insights from firm-level analysis in China. Resources Policy, 88, 104394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104394
  26. Zeqiraj, V., Sohag, K., & Soytas, U. (2020). Stock market development and low-carbon economy: The role of innovation and renewable energy. Energy Economics, 91, 104908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104908
  27. Zhou, X., Dai, M., & Liu, L. (2024). Green credit, carbon emission trading and corporate green innovation: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 86, 102445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102445
  28. Book
  29. Wardhana, Y. M. A. (2025). Manajemen Risiko Lingkungan. UI Publishing.
  30. Sustainability Reports
  31. Amman Mineral Internasional. (2023). *Sustainability report 2020-2023*. https://www.amman.com
  32. Adaro Minerals Indonesia. (2023). *Sustainability report 2020-2023*. https://www.adaro.com
  33. Bumi Resources. (2023). *Sustainability report 2020-2023*. https://www.bumiresources.com
  34. Alamtri Resources Indonesia. (2023). *Sustainability report 2020-2023*. https://www.alamtri.com
  35. Bayan Resources. (2023). *Sustainability report 2020-2023*. https://www.bayanresources.com
  36. Websites
  37. Kementerian Energi Dan Sumber Daya Mineral. (2024, January 15). Tembus Rp300,3 Triliun, PNBP Sektor ESDM di 2023 Lampaui Target. Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.esdm.go.id/id/media-center/arsip-berita/tembus-rp3003-triliun-pnbp-sektor-esdm-di-2023-lampaui-target
  38. Pt Bursa Efek Indonesia. (2023). Bursa Karbon Indonesia (IDXCarbon) Resmi Diluncurkan. Jakarta: PT BURSA EFEK INDONESIA.